SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Magnetics Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frodo Baxter who wrote (11700)4/2/1998 9:59:00 PM
From: Spots  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12298
 
>>Why cash and not bonds?

First, by cash I mean a combination of money market, ST, and IT
bonds, all of which make up part of my "cash." I was
oversimplifying the message a bit. These are near enough to
cash for my purposes. Also I do have a few LTs in the mix
because these are all funds in 401ks, etc, with limited
choices, and I couldn't avoid them.

But mainly, in regard to LTs (Target 2025 and the like), I don't
need to trade a devil I know at least somewhat
(stocks) for a devil I don't (LT bonds), which CAN hand you
major losses.

Maybe you know they won't lose in a crash, but I don't.
If LTs go contrary to the market, what good does it do
me to take profits for market timing purposes (as opposed to
portfolio rebalancing, which I am NOT doing here) just to
put them into something that loses if I'm wrong and the
market has a major rally? The point of cash and equivalents
in my move was to take a profit regardless of what happens,
not to trade fairly large risk for another admittedly probably
smaller but much less familiar (to me).

I guess the short answer is, partly I was lying for simplicty,
partly because it doesn't fit what I'm after, and partly because
if you think I'm ignorant in stocks, you should see my mental
wasteland in bonds!