Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Parker Benchley who wrote (4350)	4/3/1998 1:32:00 AM
From: King Ralph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19331

You've been a baaaaad boy George E. However, I would like to point out that on July 1st in REPLY 4251 someone named Renate asked Joe Med about the United company. There was NO inclination in the question as to what it was all about. This was BEFORE Georges post. I did not see any of the SI oldtimers, that now say they knew about this, step in and rescue Joe. Joe Med himself did not respond in any way and instead simply just bid farewell. Any reasonable person would assume that this was his answer. This unjust country of laws says Joe Med was a bad boy. Yes you're right you can be honest and still get in trouble, however I would spend every waking minute of my days trying to prove myself and would NEVER accept a plea bargin if I knew I was TRULLY not guilty. However, if I was slightly negligent in my original DD or even slightly dumb in business and got myself in the jam then I guess I would just let it go and try to forget. Of course thats just how I would do it. Joe Med has been a VERY DEEP confidant of the CEO of DCI and has been his sounding board for many of his comments. This info, although not technically revelant to DCI, is none the less important to all. I have said it before, I rather know EVERYTHING then decide, than the have things "held back" for my own good. Things like how many large blocks of shares were sold in private transactions and at what price. Again, if ALL those shares would have gone through brokers, the stock price would be at a more realistic value today. Hold it up artificially and in a true free market, the market itself will level it back to where it belongs anyways. Anyone who would have privately sold shares back to DCI at $0.75 levels either has something hide or is prettly dumb. Period. None of this "it is good for DCI to buy at that price 'cause they can buy more shares that way". Its doesn't make sense. kr <still got 2 more wishes today, dont make me use them too early please>