Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OtherChap who wrote (5312)	4/3/1998 1:57:00 PM
From: kentoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

NETZ is not a scam Why would ESVS, a NASDAQ listed company, get involved with NETZ if was just a sham ? They sure as hell know what they are getting into Wired articles are available for all to read This doesnt mean I am convinced they can really compete with DoubleClick, etc

To: OtherChap who wrote (5312)	4/3/1998 2:10:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Go to any of Zulu or ESVS websites. Type in "Hayton" in the search (including press releases) and then come back to this thread and tell us what you discovered. Nixon was a bad president. Did this make Ford or Carter, the next two in line, bad presidents? People--good or bad--who belong to yacht clubs know a lot of people who belong to yacht clubs. Sometimes they make deals. That Hayton, an Aussie, may have participated in something similar to this, has nothing to do with the facts of the current reality: Hayton has no involvement in Zulu-tek, except to advise some folks who I would presume to be on the level of "yachting buddies." I will say this, however. I've only seen one side of Hayton described. Sure I don't like what I read. But I've not heard his version of events. I may not like that either. But I'm open to discovery. Here's something I do know and it is fact. I've seen your interpretation and description of things concerning NETZ. And since Hayton has not had the benefit of comment, he comes out rosier than you do. Perhaps Hayton may have, in the past, caused some bad investment decisions in companies he was directly involved in. But I also note that you are quite adept at attempting to scare people into selling their shares so that you can use the volatility to buy them cheaper. Again, I refer any rationale reader to your quote on the Yahoo thread when you said on Tuesday, March 10th, at 10:49 a.m. (Reply #9078) "...the volatility of stocks and makes it easier to separate suckers from their money." Folks, do not EVER buy anything this Other Chap gentleman attempts to sell you.