Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N who wrote (18562)	4/3/1998 1:56:00 PM
From: celeryroot.com	Respond to of 32384

NAH, I believe you started it with your deragatory post to Bernie. By the way, where is your buddy Courtney >)

To: N who wrote (18562)	4/3/1998 2:51:00 PM
From: Flagrante Delictu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32384

NAH, I am truly sorry to hear of the almost intolerable burdens you have been forced to endure. For your sake, I will try to desist from my" derogatory fun making of the female human body" on this thread {although I didn't think I had}. Moreover, I have no objection to your continuing the inquiry on this thread of whether I have any familiarity with "cleavage" or not, & also the inquiry concerning whether I was first castrated before WW2 or after. Also, I give you permission to inquire about how many castrations I have had after the first one.And finally, please accept my permission to say anything you want on this thread about me & to inquire about anything else you choose about me. Keep posting.

To: N who wrote (18562)	4/4/1998 1:31:00 AM
From: Flagrante Delictu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32384

NAH, OFF TOPIC >> I wish you would desist in your derogatory fun making of the female human body << You have made a serious accusation that I have engaged in derogatory fun making of the female human body. So that the readers of this thread can judge whether this is a responsible accusation, won't you please list what I have written that will corroborate this serious accusation. It would be a shame if you failed to provide this information, because the readership might then have to logically conclude that you might have become a candidate, yourself, for caregiving. It is not a stretch to assume that the viewership of this thread is aware that spurious charges, unsubstantiated by credible evidence, result in a rejection of the perception of integrity on the part of the perpetrator.