Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RealTime who wrote (6602)	4/3/1998 2:34:00 PM
From: sweez	Respond to of 11708

What are we going to dispose of in this site. ?? Our Class V (5) I assume. Sweez

To: RealTime who wrote (6602)	4/3/1998 3:15:00 PM
From: Kurt N	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11708

Actually the definition of each class of well is set by the EPA, so a class I in Wyoming would be the same as one in Micigan or Utah. There is a huge difference between class I and V wells. Somebody posted a link earlier describing the differences between the various types of well, but basically class I (hazardous waste) is disposed of below the water table (wouldn't want to get any of that stuff in the drinking water supply) and a class V (non-hazardous waste unless you drink gallons of it) well disposes of stuff above where the water table is (which requires extra-care, permits from the state who probably work with the EPA, and most importantly to not harm the water supply). Now with the penalties recently passed by the state of Utah all class V waste not disposed of in an approved class V well face severe penalties. Given the costs/time to get an unapproved class V well that a company uses for its own waste (which may not get approved, because it is unsafe) and the supply/demand of class V waste processing it still is a money press. Kurt