Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N who wrote (18574)	4/3/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: celeryroot.com	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32384

" And I am not interested in your personal details... " ... and nor am I in yours

To: N who wrote (18574)	4/3/1998 4:13:00 PM
From: Flagrante Delictu	Respond to of 32384

NAH, << Tony's manhood needs no challenge. He took everybody on! << That he did & with elan. Do you think he might explain what "cleavage " is all about to me?

To: N who wrote (18574)	4/3/1998 4:48:00 PM
From: Flagrante Delictu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32384

NAH, >> And with quantitative function in tack, too . << This was a little confusing to me. At first, I thought you meant "intact". But then, I suspected you want to give me a crack at that condition. Could you explain" in tack"?

To: N who wrote (18574)	4/3/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: Flagrante Delictu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32384

NAH, Thanks for explaining that " in tack" was not correct. Did you mean "intact"? Also when you told us" Tony's manhood needs no challenge!", you followed that up later in your post by stating, "But I do worry about a few others here from time to time,,, Uh, oh, is that the pitter patter of pomponed feet I hear in the distance? Ah well, gender worries" I was also confused as to what you meant by this. Would you please explain it? Thanks in advance for your attention to this.