Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV -- Good Prospects? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (2488)	4/3/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: Mark S. Schroeder	Respond to of 7703

But who will close us at $4.00?

To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (2488)	4/3/1998 3:57:00 PM
From: Forest Gump	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7703

Is it possible that the MM's will try to keep this thing closing at just above 4.00 in order to satisfy the NASDAQ listing requirements and take their time getting all the people holding for less to sell? Looks like daytraders trying to get out before the bell...

To: Secret_Agent_Man who wrote (2488)	4/3/1998 4:13:00 PM
From: Rick	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7703

Byron - my first weekend piece of cogent analyses (since last weekend..) I cut and pasted this from Frank Collucio's remarks on a post he made: "It stands to reason that if Cisco and Ascend (and others in this ilk), say, succeed in blanketing the carriers with their wares for the purpose of those carriers extending outsourced Layer Three WAN services to their subscribers, then there will be that much less of a need by enterprises (who pay a higher premium, I might add) to secure their own network elements for the WAN. It goes back to the debate over choosing between public or private solutions. It seems to me that the pendulum continues to swing in the direction of public, which is not necessarily very good news for hardware vendors who have targeted the enterprise (as opposed to the pure-play carrier vendors). In some ways this boils down to the old question of "what do you want to be when you grow up?" _______ I like Franks' analysis - because it suggest to me that what you want to be in the future is what DGIV will be -- a carrier :-) (not VoIP hardware vendor etc.) + much less competition in the markets that DGIV is entering. Less competition = more profits. Less marketing expenditure needed (for many reasons) = more profits etc. etc. etc. GMWTH Have a good weekend.. Ciao.