SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CellularVision (CVUS): 2-way LMDS wireless cable. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dwight martin who wrote (1796)4/3/1998 9:12:00 PM
From: DreamWeaver  Respond to of 2063
 
That previous post reminded me of the feeling I get when I read the CVUS thread on Yahoo !!! Huh ?????



To: dwight martin who wrote (1796)4/3/1998 9:14:00 PM
From: DreamWeaver  Respond to of 2063
 
<<Are you saying Amati/TI will be able to place ORCTF in a legal bind for using their technology without a license? And what is DMT?>>

On second thought maybe this is a copy of CVUS' press release....



To: dwight martin who wrote (1796)4/4/1998 1:21:00 AM
From: JW@KSC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2063
 
Re: Are you saying Amati/TI will be able to place ORCTF in a legal bind

Are you saying Amati/TI will be able to place ORCTF in a legal bind for using their technology without a license? And what is DMT?

Dwight,

Prior to the TI purchase of Amati, Amati said it would pursue patent infringements of DMT, though they could not pursue until the technology was used in modems that were sold commercially. There were many manufactures who had modems in trials around the world. Trials do not count. Now that TI owns the Patent rights to DMT, and knowing TI's past record on pursuing patent infringements I would say yes, TI will go after Orckit. Amati had licensed DMT to many large companies ie. MOT, TI, NEC, Analog Devices, PAIR, etc. If the Patents were not enforceable, I doubt if companies such as these would have paid the 3%-7% royalties.

This will help explain DMT the ANSI and ETSI Standard for ADSL since 1993:

WHY DMT
Message 555777

WHY SDMT for VDSL
Message 2274306

After reading those you may enjoy some entertainment?
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com
techstocks.com

Regards,
JW@KSC