SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (30979)4/4/1998 12:57:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573772
 
<Do you know that there is NO commercial compiler in the
world that supports this mode of operation? >

Ali, do you really expect people to belive this claim? Intel presented statistics which showed that the average user could expect an error from their FDIV bug only once every 25,000 years, yet they were compelled to replace all pentium processors. I have provided a link to AMD's own admission of their FPU bug, you have made a claim that has all the authority of a fart. Backup your claim or we will consider it to be just more of your methane gas. Your track record is about as good as Fuchi's when it comes to accuracy. Your claim that Intel's 100mhz bus won't result in any significant performance improvement will have to face the facts in a couple of weeks. My guess is that your claim here was just another fart too. We'll see soon.

Fuchi's Pal,

Elmer



To: Ali Chen who wrote (30979)4/4/1998 1:13:00 AM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573772
 
Ali
Intel may be facing more competition in high end. Bloomberg just released note on new Elbrus - E2K which was designed by 200 Russian scientists and financed by Sun Microsystems. The older version of Elbrus already running in test sparc systems in the field trials that is by companies with high computational requirements. That is coming when a lot of intel investors wrote off sparc as a contender for future high end.
E2K is using post-RISC (whatever that means) approach. It is characterized as most effective and the fastest processor in the world. It will likely be more effective in computational operation than Merced. The post-RISC approach was originally designed for Russian super-computers and completely different (whatever that means) from currently used x86 or RISC platforms.
It was mentioned that because of the difficulties in economy Russian designers had to concentrate on logic and effectiveness rather than rely on hardware/technology. And "economic" approach paid-off in E2K by not only making it the fastest but also most efficient with a small transistor count.
The elbrus team is currently in negotiations for foundry and/or licesing of the chip to Sun and other manufacturers.
So we might see Paul screaming commies again soon.
Regards
-Albert
ps it is expected that E2K may make to western markets (us included) by 2000.



To: Ali Chen who wrote (30979)4/4/1998 10:55:00 AM
From: Brian Hutcheson  Respond to of 1573772
 
Ali , re. should we expect a new rally ?
The Intelopers are more aware of the serious competition from AMD .
No doubt the 49% of sub $1000 PCs and the lousy reception of the Celery has something to do with it .
The indications look good if there is some good news from CC to offset the loss expected .
Brian