Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Airstar Technologies, Inc. (ASTG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Go Team who wrote (1638)	4/4/1998 1:47:00 AM
From: uu	Respond to of 3967

Dan, I read your post and truly even for me who has been having fun on occasion on this thread, this is getting a bit too outrageous, and laughed my head off from the recent postings to the point where my eyes started crying! Seriously though who are these new cast of characters? I thought about it and then said to myself could it be that all these people are in fact just one person whom we all know namely Evangelist Joseph Lanza? Lets examine this! Thomas Jon Swift the 15 million dollar man with a portfolio that consists of only LU, IBM and XECM! Joe Lanza also had millions of dollars with $3.5 million invested in Xecom (and he said at one point he did not own any other stock but XECM)! I find a very strong similarity between Mr. TJS and Joe Lanza! Then we have Mr. Dal Grauer a self claimed director of Xecom who comments on the future propsects of the company with such confidence while admiting he does not have the slightest idea what company's business plans are! Does this not sound familiar?! Again Joe Lanza! And then we have the new character the SuckerFinder! Doesnt the name describe the job description of the person we all know! The great news is Joe is not lost, he is just appearing as three different individuals on this thread! One thing though you have to admit, no where else on SI you will find so much fun and laughter as you would find here! Long Live XECM (the popular and pure SEE-BS sit-com techstocks.com )!

To: Go Team who wrote (1638)	4/4/1998 11:05:00 AM
From: Thomas Jon Swift	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3967

Hey Dan, Please lighten up. You're right about one thing. This whole thread has been full of bull--from the first few posting on down to the last few. I think you have to learn to understand irony and sarcasm a little better. Suckerfinder's sarcasm is definately a waste of everyone's time, especially his own. (I for one an flabbergasted that some on this thread have taken him literally.) For what it's worth, you (and everyone else on this thread) can forget how much I'm worth, or not worth. (Jack Rogers posting listing by portfolio as LU, IBM and XECOM was excellent--and very funny. He gets its the irony, it seems.) Ultimately, the only thing I'm interested in whether to sell, hold or buy XECOM. So here's my challenge to Dal or Joe Lanza or anyone else who cares to post on this thread: Can anyone make a compelling case for or against XECOM? Dal, let's have a list of bullet points explaining in detail why someone, knowing full well that XECOM has been a disaster for two years, would want to now own shares. P.S. The 10-K is now 4 days late. Dal, can we at least get a posting listing 4th quarter gross revenues and cost of sales??? TJS