Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Preview Travel (PTVL) ---- Via...Excite & AOL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Hua who wrote (193)	4/4/1998 10:48:00 AM
From: TLindt	Respond to of 728

There're many big names in this business. For example, Microsoft's Expedia did about the same amount of bookings as PTVL. Tom MicroSoft is not a 'pure play' for travel...they do a lot of other things too... A 'pure play' the way I see it is a company focused on travel, and you can buy into them. ie...you can't buy into MicroSoft's Expedia as a stock. You've got to buy MicroSoft to do that, so the effects of the travel business are not 'pure'.

To: Tom Hua who wrote (193)	4/6/1998 4:28:00 PM
From: Platter	Respond to of 728

Interview Excerpt from Money Daily....While didn't mention PTVL I think its applicable.........MONEY.COM: What's your view of Internet companies -- the Yahoos (NASDAQ:YHOO), the E*Trades (NASDAQ:EGRP), the DoubleClicks (NASDAQ:DCLK) of the world? MURPHY: Well, there are some huge winners in there, and it's way early to figure out which ones they are. You can do two things. Either take the attitude that you're going to try to play the game -- because right now it's primarily a game of guessing which one will do well. And these are very volatile stocks, which can run up or get cut in half in an eye blink. So you can buy several of them and hope that the better one -- say that Yahoo ultimately wins or Excite ultimately wins -- whoever it is that ultimately wins, your profits on that one would make up for your smaller profits or losses on the others. Or you can wait until the sector matures more and then come in. And I think for most individuals, waiting is a good idea. The business models for these companies haven't even stabilized. We don't even know if advertising will support a company on the Internet. Who knows? MONEY.COM: And the current valuations of Internet companies are ... MURPHY: Oh, the valuations are totally out of line. In fact, I've talked to most Internet Wall Street analysts -- they're aren't that many of them -- in the last few months, and they don't have many recommendations. Because, historically, 45 times prospective earnings is about as much value as you can maintain on this kind of a stock. And even if you go out two or three years from now, they're still at more than 45 times those earnings. So they've become trading sardines, as we call them. You know, people are playing with them. The hot money guys are leaping in because the stocks are going up. There'll probably be a pretty nasty correction in here at some point. Perhaps triggered by one of these companies, either running out of money or trying a subscription model and discovering that nobody subscribes. From "Money Daily"