To: stanley new who wrote (5625 ) 4/4/1998 1:39:00 PM From: Chuca Marsh Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14226
But why is this so interesting to me, is the calculation of the absurd really correct, is just a penny per ounce in the ground that I was funning around with a friends' Nuclear Math Equations really correct? ( Simply high is what I will say at that valuation PER SQ KILOMETER -Just under a $Million per SQ KM just down to 20 feet ) And a Kilometer is .65 of a square mile. >Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 21:46:07 -0600 >To: >From: chuca marsh <bondee@ma.ultranet.com> >Subject: Re: Maybe us are a penny an ounce... > > IF ok-EDIT and send around to me to send to the entire XXX Group, OK? Chuca >A Calculcation of the absurd: So...it almost makes sense. If E Charters can talk about Platinum from Spark Plugs, then we can talk COPPER from a penny! Yes, that makes sense. So, what if we use double that or a plus factor of 10% that with possible OTHER METALS. > Jim of Jaba just called me - HE is sending me his partners' BOOK- Out of Print aka The Testement of Geology it is reviewed...Geology of Mineral Resources by Jim Gilbert -it is at Amazon.com as a special order out of print one; plus, a Course book. >Maybe we just might be at the start of SOMETHING..big. >Canadian: Naxos Resources (NAXOF) > >| Previous | ------ | Respond | >To: +Kim W. Brasington (11479 ) >From: +E. Charters Thursday, Apr 2 1998 7:41PM EST >Reply # of 11500 > >Reserves in Canada are proven, probable, and indicated or sometimes >called possible. They all can be used to make valuations at different >numbers of profit cents on the dollar. Proven are worth 50 cents on the profit dollar that may be assumed. If there are substantial proven then probable are allowed to be included and are worth a bit less, perhaps 15 cents. Indicated are worth still less and only if there are substantial amounts of the previous two categories. These valuations are used to estimate the property's worth for purposes of sale or option by exchange rules. > >This is from an engineer whose reports are used as models for engineering reports by the VSE. > >The resource category is, I believe relatively new. It has to be estimated from geological information and sampling of different types. It can be inferred from data collected from adjacent deposits and even geochemical signatures, if there is a history to the data's reliability. > >EC<:-} > > > >From: l.com> >>Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 21:27:41 EST >>To: bondee@ma.ultranet.com >>Subject: Re: Maybe us are a penny an ounce... >> >>Nuclear math with much rounding off of numbers >>15 sq miles = approx 25 sq km >>20 ft of dirt = 12 MM tons of dirt per sq km >>average 0.25 oz ton (OF STUFF is a fair average of a Dirter!) >> >>0.25*12*25*0.01= $750,000 or $7,500 per 1% ( There ya go Stan The Man, Muse on this E-all-mail:- as I said UNDER a $1,000,000 dollars)( Now - Gippies put your .75 OPT COC stuff against that number! Am I the onlt ony who wonders how many KILOS fit into an Hassey Ore Pile of 500,ooo Tooones ( I am speaking ...ENGLISH, gots it now friends Romans and Countrymen lend me you ears - I have come to praise Caesar Salads!) (Chuca Addons)Nucleat Math- I love that phrase, and also, Direct Coupled Plasma; Tweekem & Nuke-um, that is the key to prooving us non-geo types, DCP and ICP; spread on a little salad acid and BINGO! It is jsut that simple and only several other NEWTECH Threaders, ever talk about it. Damn, The Sojourner- Mars Rover used the same TYPE instrumernt that could be used to X-Ray Flouro or ICP/DCP the ore pile...but the damn NASDAQ won't count that as allowable in a Company Press release! Change will happen with the current guidlines or because of them...all these COC numbers could ...be...tripled with a little Ceasar Salad Dressing, JIMHO and...others! That is the fact. Acids, and bases are the new alchemy that I am believing in. No thing but this NEWTECH. >> >> >