To: I Am John Galt who wrote (5360 ) 4/4/1998 3:55:00 PM From: PartyTime Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18444
I answered your first question. You responded. I asked you to post, together, my response to your question and your rebuttal to my answer. You did not. Here it is: YOUR QUESTION: >>>Why Zulu over competitors?<<< MY ANSWER: Good question. As a customer, I'd be impressed with the existing client list. As a customer, I, importantly, wouldn't want my internet advertising provider to be the same one my competitor uses. Just this simple fact tells us Doubleclick ain't the only game in town. If you do the math from this point on, you'll see that Zulu has standing. For example, do you think Microsoft and Sun will want to share the same online advertising contract? I don't think so. There are other places to go. Zulu, for example. As an investor, there's phenomenal room for growth and profit given the current position in the near the mid-50 mark. A rise to a dollar in a relatively short amount of time is, by no means, out of the question. This will have to do for now. Will be getting back to you on other answers, unless others get there first. You see, I'm in the process of moving and don't have time to crank up search engines and other verifications necessary to prove all of the answers you require. YOUR REBUTTAL: In rebuttal to your answer, we have people jumping on our client network because their competitors have already joined. They don't wish to be left behind, and they have to equal out the field of playing in the SIM network. As a customer, you would be impressed with the client list. But if you're running a demographic ad campaign, and you're a "PTP"er, the client list is not what you're going for, the network is what's the most important thing. Client lists don't mean anything if they're on websites that aren't seen. The network is the most important thing, and how many hits they get on those sites, and from who, and what kind of sites they are. MY CONCLUSION TO THE ABOVE: I'm to believe, from your rebuttal, that the respective competing sectors will not want alternative providers? Best price and quality of product will always exist in more than one place. Thus, no matter how you put it, Zulu is an option for online advertising. No one can question the exisitng and substantial customer base. For a penny stock, this is a bonus. How can anyone deny this? Regarding the second phase of my answer, I note only your silence. I stated, in effect, that the present quality of investing in NETZ is that the stock will soon hit the buck mark again. I'd expect no seasoned expert would argue against the realism of this possibility.