SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Seth Shafer who wrote (5369)4/4/1998 7:58:00 PM
From: OtherChap  Respond to of 18444
 
>Can you produce quotes from people that place Hayton in control that
>ARENT from people who are currently involved in a lawsuit against
>NETZ?

Well, there certainly are no SEC filings, since this is a non-reporting company. And I remember a few posts a while back where someone called some person at NETZ and asked if Hayton was "in charge".. The employee said "Who told you that? Where did you get that name???"

It seems that current NETZ employees are under a gag rule not to mention Hayton's name at all. But, as soon as people leave, or are fired, they ALL say hayton is running the show. True- most of them are suing NETZ, but the first rule in a lawsuit is to go after the person that controls the money. No surprise that they're all going after Hayton.




To: Seth Shafer who wrote (5369)4/4/1998 8:21:00 PM
From: Jon Tara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18444
 
" It seems as if the only people insinuating he is in charge are also people who stand to benefit financially if that were the case."

Huh?

How would these people gain if Hayton is in control?

The action against the company is over money allegedly owed them. It doesn't matter if Hayton is in control or not - if the cour finds that the company, in fact, owes them the money, then they will prevail, no matter who is in control.