SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : MARUM RESOURCES ON ALBERTA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wally B who wrote (420)4/4/1998 9:30:00 PM
From: The Osprey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2514
 
Ok Guys,
I have been watching this thread for some time and own Marum. I don't want to appear overly stupid but from what I gather the company is flying the property in search of Kimberlite pipes.What type of system are they using? Is it some kind of topography survey using a, for a better term ,(sonar) type device which measures magnetics.What is it? Is there a word for it I can search and learn about? I know this is stupid and I was scared to admit my ignorance but could someone please explain???

Thanks

Doug J



To: Wally B who wrote (420)4/5/1998 12:58:00 AM
From: bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2514
 
NOt sure what's happening with SI. I've now tried to post this
message twice with no luck.

Yes, of course, that could very well be what is going on. If MMU
has found a kimberlite pipe, then they should be able to establish
an aeromagnetic signature. Having done that, and operating on the
assumption that kimberlite pipes in the same area will have similar
signatures, it would make sense for them to fly tight grids looking
for such signatures. They'd be in a good position to negotiate
a deal with their partners and others. "You've got the property
but we've got the key."

Let's hope that's the case. An NR next week should confirm the
hypothesis.

A caution I'd throw in is this: when DMM found its pipes, there was
a great many attempts to locate them and to identify their signatures.
The same was true when ABZ found its pipes. The problem is, of course,
that the South African, Australian and even Russian signatures don't
seem to be much help. The head of WSP's program is a Russian and
he says that Snap Lake is going to result in a lot of rewriting of
diamond geology. If you want to read about an exercise in frustration,
read the WSP thread. Diamonds everywhere, kimberlite everywhere,
dykes everywhere, but no bloody pipe. MEO and NCS have just spent
a lot of money in Ablerta. No pipes.

In the NWT you have indicator mineral trails. They help but they
also confuse. GGL has indicators minerals all over their property.
No pipe.

In Alberta overburden. As well, the rock sometimes hosts minerals
that create anomolies. But no kimberlite.

So, if you are right and if they've got a pipe, figured out the
signature and are doing the tight grids because we know that pipes
come in clusters, then yahoo!!



To: Wally B who wrote (420)4/6/1998 1:06:00 AM
From: bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2514
 
Wally,
You've got me thinking about signatures. I assume that all the
juniors know where ACA has been drilling. There is nothing to stop
them from overflying ACA property and doing the aeromagnetics
of the known pipes. That would give them the signatures of the
ACA pipes. Why wouldn't they then be able to apply those figures
to any anomolies that appear on their own surveys?