Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : MPVIF Mountain Province Mining -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chas. who wrote (702)	4/4/1998 11:35:00 PM
From: GuitarMan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2577

Chuck, Are you long MPV or short ? - Mark

To: Chas. who wrote (702)	4/8/1998 8:24:00 PM
From: sunset	Respond to of 2577

#702 - To say that DeBeers would require 40%+ gem quality in order to justify production proves how little you truly know about diamonds and DeBeers. Do your homework, a majority of producing mines only yield around 25% gem quality. Some are even lower, the Argyle mine in Australia produces about 5% -10% Gem quality. Your point is not accurate and very misleading. Go home Chuc

To: Chas. who wrote (702)	4/8/1998 8:42:00 PM
From: sunset	Respond to of 2577

#699 - Here is my humble opinion. De Beers needs and wants for future JVs. This is a vital part of maintaining control. DeBeers does not and will not purposely damage their relationship with MPV by playing political games. If they did, do you think anybody else would want a JV with them? Call Beth Kirkwood or Bill Jarvis at TNK and ask them what they think about DeBeers and how they do business. They want and need a producing mine. There is excellent value here no matter how you slice it. Good things come to those who waitS. Trading this stock now is simply ridiculous in my opinion.