SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIS: WHAT IS GOING ON? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MAUI BOY who wrote (1052)4/5/1998 6:02:00 AM
From: chaz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6931
 
This is really strange...I went to Big Charts, Microsoft Investor, and Yahoo, plus my own broker...asked for a chart of TSIS...and got back "Not in Database"...and yet two of you put me onto the correct charts. Oh well, it's a computer and I'm not. Thanks fellas.

I gotta admit, this company has some compelling elements. I cautioned earlier that the capital barrier to entry is low, but I should add the flip side is a fairly high bar, since the profit side is dependent (for the moment) on a large customer base making small revenue contributions each.

I'm definitely going to call the 1-888 number. Being a skeptic (no offense intended...just DD) do we have a list of the numbers to call for the companies reportedly signed on...would be a way to verify what we're being told.

Finally, for now, what sort of p/e would this board assign/anticipate for TSIS once showing a profit and audited?



To: MAUI BOY who wrote (1052)4/5/1998 12:12:00 PM
From: Terry T.  Respond to of 6931
 
Re: alleged "nosdedive" last November: Although I cannot prove it, I do not believe stock ever plunged as low as shown by your chart on that one day in November. There was a lot of discussion about the appearance of a price drop below .20 at the time, and it was my impression that no one ever believed there was such a trade or it was an oddball, isolated aberrational trade.

There was a much smaller price drop from about .68 to about .58 as I recall, occurring ironically right after the November 1997 "official" press release confirming that AT & T deal was signed, and that system was or soon would be up and running. This price drop is why some of us complain on this thread that good news seems to depress this stock. However, if you go back and look at the preceding several months of press releases (before November drop), one can understand that some investors were very frustrated by the lack of information on gross and net revenue from the AT & T deal, and gross and net revenue from other deals. It also took somewhat longer to get AT & T system up and running as I recall, further frustrating investors and release of reliable revenue information. I was one of those frusrtrated because I thought an early November 1997 press release indicated a net of $70K a month from AT & T deal, whereas the press release later in November suggested $70K gross from AT & T.

I hope this helps a little with the history. I have been buying since early October 1997 (although I wished I had held off until January 1998), and in my humble opinion think we have a winner here.

Terry T.



To: MAUI BOY who wrote (1052)4/5/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: neverenough  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6931
 
I would guess MM's did a little shake out.