SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : BAAT - world records for electric vehicles with zinc-air -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ravi Ratnam who wrote (3270)4/5/1998 11:00:00 AM
From: shashyazhi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6464
 
I agree about the daytraders running the price up at the open. I
subscribed to a daytrading BB which is moderated by a host who
gives news alerts, trading alerts, and urgent buy alerts. At least
one daytrader among this group of 3000 traders remarked on
Osvaldo Christian's SI post. For the last week, while BAAT has
been relatively quiet, the host has been advising the daytraders
to accumulate shares on the pullbacks. Then, Friday morning,
upon learning of the JV, the host told the daytraders, "OK, there's
a JV announced, you all know what that means." Then he issued
two urgent buy alerts, telling the daytraders that they could all make
"half a stone", or $500 from the quick movement. Then the BB
server went down, and the host had to drive over to another city
to reset the remote computer, so several more urgent buy alerts
were not issued. Later, at least one daytrader bragged that he had
made "a stone and a half", or $1500 from the quick move from
$0.89 to $1.03. There is nothing particularly unethical about this
daytrading BB, but they do feed upon Silicon Investor for information,
all the while regarding the long term investors as "putzes" who fill
up the SI board with chatter, instead of information. As a long term
investor, who wants to see BAT grow to a greater potential, I feel
that anybody who knows any good news about BAT should post it.
My partner feels that news should be kept secret. My argument to him is news should only be kept secret if he plans to buy more shares at
the next open. I also believe, that as long as his shares are down
from his purchase price, that he should welcome the posting of any
news which would draw attention to BAT International.



To: Ravi Ratnam who wrote (3270)4/5/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: Paul  Respond to of 6464
 
I am on the email list of two other companys that I have owned or do own GATE formally (ZCAD) and PSIX. Both send me email about press releases about to be released. I don't think there is anything unusual about what BAAT does with its shareholders at all.

Paul



To: Ravi Ratnam who wrote (3270)4/5/1998 2:14:00 PM
From: Gutterball  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6464
 
Sorry Ratman, but here is what BAAT has to say about the number of shareholders...

"Finally, we would like to provide some statistics about B.A.T. stockholders.ÿ In recent months, the number of shareholders has increased exponentially to over l0,000 shareholders. B.A.T. stockholders owning blocks of stock under 10,000 shares control over 75% of the free trading shares.ÿ Additionally over 6,500 shareholders, own blocks less 5000 shares and over 2,500 shareholders own less than 500 shares."

You say ... "BAT routinely sends out faxes to about 1200 comprising members of the general public, media,Industry and shareholders who had requested to be on the list."

I still say... BAT leaks information to a small group of investors before it is public and that this practice should stop. Think of all the money they could save or put another way, all the shares of BAAT they wouldn't have to sell. Using email and faxes to coordinate their day care service on April 18 is OK. But alerting small groups of investors walks a thin line.

I know guano when I see it, I just don't step in it. Got it!



To: Ravi Ratnam who wrote (3270)4/5/1998 9:51:00 PM
From: Robin Breese  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6464
 
Ravi what happend to the Hungarian deal, is that still coming or was there a mix up in the information pipeline?