Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael meyers who wrote (18657)	4/6/1998 1:16:00 AM
From: Flagrante Delictu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32384

Michael, >> John, a great post, thanks. Your rebuttal to Bernie was far better than I could have done. << Michael, I have no reason to doubt your confession that John Dickson is capable of a far better rebuttal to me than you could have done.. However, once again it appears that you have had difficuty comprehending what you have read. John Dickson's post is not a rebuttal of my post requesting that you show evidence to support your obviously false allegation that I "'make fun of women all the time". John Dickson's post is an inquiry into whether the alma mater you purport to have attended to receive 2 degrees, the U. of Chicago, provided you with a sufficient education to inform you against making reckless, unprovable accusations , & whether we might expect a U. of Chicago grad to have sufficient evidence to corroborate any accusations he would make. He asked, "how do we know that a U. of Chicago man would have received a sufficient education to inform him against making reckless, unprovable accusations?" The balance of his inquiry indicated concern with the kind of education one might expect at such a place. He even questioned whether you were a U. of Chicago man," Michael, if he is a U. of Chjcago man... " So, you think an inquiry into whether you even attended the school you claim to have received 2 degrees from, as well as whether you received the calibre of education one might have reasonably expected from an institution with supposedly high standards, is a rebuttal? Maybe, John Dickson had reason to question your capability to post reliabably. Instead of defending your purported alma mater, you praised John for a great post.