SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : IMAT - ultrafast tomography for coronary artery disease -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John R Resseger who wrote (2339)4/6/1998 12:52:00 AM
From: Steven Durrington  Respond to of 3725
 
John,

This U/S technique is a developing technology and is not in
clinical use yet. It does sound interesting though for future
applications.

It does not detect heart attacks. What the article meant was
that it could be used to demonstrate the calcification of small
atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary artery wall, which is
an early, but relatively subtle sign of developing cardiac
disease. If these changes are detected early, then preventative
measures (lifestyle changes, medication, patient education) can
be implemented to lessen the risk to the patient and hopefully,
prevent or delay the development of significant cardiac disease.
If the plaques are left to progress unchecked, they slowly
increase in size, and reduce blood flow through the vessel,
eventually leading to a complete blockage, and starvation of
blood to the heart muscle (myocardial infarction = heart attack).
or can break off and travel to another part of the body, causing
a stroke elsewhere.

The technique described in the article uses a principle called
"resonance". This is where certain types of atoms/molecules
respond to a specific frequency (in this case, a frequency of
sound). MRI uses the same principle, using radiofrequency pulses.
I'm kinda guessing that calcium has a certain resonant frequency
to Ultrasonic waves, and that the return resonant echo from
the calcium found in atherosclerotic plaques and breast
tumours will alert physicians to its presence.

You may want to read my previous post about "gold standards".
I wouldn't make comments that any one imaging modality is
"better" than another, at least until there are some clinical
trials and published results. You may find that the applications
of this technique are very limited (e.g. there is often normal
calcification of the breast ducts, which may be indistinguishable
from the cancerous calcium, unless a mammogram is done for more
information). What I'm getting at is that often, techniques such
as this U/S and perhaps IMAT's scanner are used as screening
tools for obvious pathologies, but a positive initial result
still may require that the "gold standard" test is performed
for more confident and specific information.

I don't want to appear too anal on this thread. I realize that
I have certain insider knowledge about Medical Imaging techniques
that others don't fully appreciate, but I don't want to get into
the habit of correcting laymens statements too much. Sorry if
I jumped the gun prematurely, and thanks for drawing our attention
to this interesting concept.

If anyone want to ask questions about Medical Imaging/Radiology
techniques in general, please feel free to e-mail me privately,
and I'll answer as soon as possible.

As for IMAT, I'm still largely ignorant of the specifics, and
I'll put in my 2 cents worth when I'm better informed.

Regards,

Durro