SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (2506)4/6/1998 6:24:00 PM
From: Geoff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10852
 
I posted this on the Fool, I wanted to see what anyone here thought about all these press releases that seemed to explode out of LOR today.

=============

Subject: C* Partners
Date: Mon, Apr 6, 1998 18:18 EDT
From: Fozziebare
Message-id: <1998040622182401.SAA04317@ladder01.news.aol.com>

With all the talks of "@Home in the Sky" going on between TCI and LOR for Cyberstar, would it begin to make sense that TCI may be the long awaited Internet partner? We now have a hardware/software provider (HP and Verifone), a networker (Adaptec), a billing solution provider (Irdeto) and a company with a large affinity group (TCI and @Home). A large affinity group was a key aspect to Readware's criteria for a Internet Partner for C*, as well as
several hundred million dollars, $200 million if memory serves, which TCI has. Just some more speculation, but could a TCI partnership be the partner?

With the forementioned companies as partners for C*, it would seem that LOR has arranged a quite strong alliance of players, strong enough to bring a broadband service like C* to life. Every piece of the puzzle is there, from the sats, to the routers, to the servers, to the billing system, to the OS, all the way down to the group of people to target the C* machines to! I love it when a business plan comes together! Anyone else got an opinion?

geoff

===========



To: DMaA who wrote (2506)4/6/1998 9:10:00 PM
From: Diogeron  Respond to of 10852
 
I don't think that's correct. Gates was a contributor to Clinton in both '92 and '96 if my memory serves me correctly.

Nonetheless, I'd be surprised if it matters. Anyone remember the IRIDF national security "scandal" of a year or so ago? I'm more worried that they stay on schedule with the launches and execute their business plan, which I suspect they will do nicely.