Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Reg Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jbal who wrote (262)	4/7/1998 3:29:00 AM
From: Marty Lee	Respond to of 825

jbal.. thanx! I just e-mailed the IAS address to some personal friends at the FCC. I asked them to check out the site and report back whatever they can find regarding the donut antenna's claims to fame. Volume on Reg was only a little more than 3800 shares on the 6th. Rats! Expect something by the middle or end of the month? Sounds familiar. Are we to expect Ford and Reg to jointly announce grand plans to utilize the Rand Cam Engine concept? Or just more tests? Sincerely, Marty

To: jbal who wrote (262)	4/7/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: Marty Lee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 825

jbal.. IAS smells fishy. The word back from the FCC is that not one telecommunications engineer could validate the claims of IAS. The donut antenna does not overcome the limitations that make tower antenna useful - despite all the airplanes that crash into them. <g> Also, the IAS site was lacking in info about what frequencies and for what uses the antenna would find a niche to operate. If the antenna has any advantages over other existing technologies now in use, HOW it has them, by what theories it has them is closer to the reality of Dick Tracy than those of physics. Ask Johnny how many telecommunications engineers have a few hundred thousand invested in IAS... ask him to name them. If John says he "can't," you have my permission to shoot him. Sincerely, Marty