Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (14269)	4/7/1998 8:36:00 AM
From: JDN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

Dear Ron: Hallelujah!!!! I BELIEVE, AMEN BROTHER!! Seriously, I am retired and TAVA represents BY FAR my single largest common stock investment (I have 19 others). I wouldnt expose myself like this for one minute in a stock that isnt even NMS status if I wasnt VERY confident. I will tell you another thing, I didnt even go to the annual shareholders meeting as not only did I have confidence in the Company and its Management but also in the SI thread participants who did go. JDN

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (14269)	4/7/1998 10:25:00 AM
From: Mr Logic	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Ron, the company does not need to hype, with posts like that. >>Thus, my continued bullish stance. Bill, Patrick, and the other shorts will eventually provide that much more upside potential as support is unheld and their profit window expires, at which time they will go long.<< Short interest is small. I would not be long above $5. >>Face it folks, this is a war between buyers and sellers, those who believe and those who don't, or wish to take advantage of your insecurity.<< It is not a war. You are not cheering on your football team. You are telling people that if they sell they are insecure. This is an insidious message. >>...pursuing short positions against those bigcaps with uncertain future earnings than a company almost guaranteed to be making money for the next 4 years.<< They have made no money for the past 5 years. There Y2K product is not yet proven in the marketplace - this is a very wild assertion. >>That's why I have to believe the shorts lurketh about merely to take advantage of short term weakness (read buying opportunity) in the stock. They know full well that they really want to be able to buy this stock cheap and sell it at higher levels<< I was short before the 'weakness' which may or may not be a buying opportunity and may or may not be short term. >>and they are looking to the "weak sisters" who are uncertain about holding this stock to help them out a bit.<< Back on the psycho stuff: (excuse me ladies but I didn't start it) "Hey are you a MAN or are you some WEAK SISTER who is just going to sell??" Phew. Got that off my chest.