SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Philip J. Davis who wrote (52070)4/7/1998 1:18:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Notice the miniscule IOM volume. The big players want nothing to do with this stock. It is Drifting. Drifting. drifting. drif...



To: Philip J. Davis who wrote (52070)4/7/1998 1:54:00 PM
From: Michael M  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
I see the Three Scrooges are strutting their "stuff" today. Rock, Rod and Jock (???) are taking turns kicking the crap out of the dog..... fine fellows all. Here's hoping the little pooch shows some tooth next week and bites 'em all on the ass. Pathetic people, really. By the way boys, have you noticed that the Naz is going to hell today and Motorola left a puddle on the carpet? The likely story is IOM is feeling someone else's pain today.



To: Philip J. Davis who wrote (52070)4/7/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: Jock Hutchinson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
Phil; That's the point. Rocky is not to be trusted because he is short on IOM. I am not to be trusted because I am not short on IOM. You can get as angry as you want, but the fundamentals of this company are very poor, and the stock is headed further down. How many subscribers read Business Week? Boy that's a really compelling defense of KE. You have a less than one percent chance of losing your data. Phil I know, this might come as a surprise to someone such as yourself whose response to honest criticism is to send a person a single word obscenity as a reply in a private message over the SI board, but for people who really know what intellectual capital means, you really don't want to store thousands of hours of your best work on something that has a "less than one percent chance of failing" Contrast this to INTC's response when the very very slight flaw was brought to their attention in the initial Pentium. And let me tell you how my boorish infantile mind works. If a company has marketed one deeply flawed product, is being sued by its shareholders for fraud committed by its former CEO, and is about to lose very important elements of its niche as a result of other litigation, I am not going to be holding my breath for their next generation of product or their new line of products. Let me put it in terms you could understand. If you sold gas at your gas station that resulted in every one out of one hundred cars exploding, you would be out of business very quickly. Now as far as the fact that you have speculated your family's hard money on a piece of junk like IOM, I feel compassion for you, but the party is over, and the sooner you realize it, the better off you are. Your next move in life might be to start a self-help group for "last to knows" such as yourself. Lord knows there are a ton of people in AMZN, YHOO, AOL, and the like who are going to need your help. If you act quickly, you could start a company of therapists and take advantage of this exciting growth opportunity.