Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (11559)	4/7/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: mfgrep	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

All-- Is it commonplace for assay results to omit a certain depth level from a drill hole? For example......2.4 oz/ton on drill hole #1 depth 275'-300' excluding 285'-290'. Just curious. Jason

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (11559)	4/7/1998 5:32:00 PM
From: Eric Tai	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Tom, <<However, this is a sedimentary deposit with very similar results in HORIZONTAL slices, not vertical.>> On what basis can you make the above statement? I've been watching this stock for the last several years, all I can say is that some samples in certain segment of certain hole contain some gold results by using certain assaying method. Can't even say that the same sample will turn out similar gold value by using other assaying method or other labs. How can you say that it will have similar results in HORIZONTAL slices? -- when they are still struggling to find a method that can give all labs similar result on the same sample.

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (11559)	4/7/1998 7:16:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

We seem to be stalling momentum wise? Where are the numbers from the rest of the holes? JLA