SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : CXI-Commodore Environmental -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andrew Furst who wrote (519)4/8/1998 12:43:00 PM
From: Czechsinthemail  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1755
 
from the Commodore Environmental Services' announcement:

Commodore Environmental Services also owns approximately 43% of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. (Amex: CXI; CXIW). On October 5, 1997, Commodore Applied received its first commercial contract, a nuclear waste remediation project at the Weldon Spring, Mo., U.S. Department of Energy site. The contract was with site manager, Morrison Knudsen.
In December, Commodore Applied also signed agreements with ICF Kaiser and Lockheed Martin. The company also announced that its SET(TM) (solvated electron technology) process has successfully remediated mixed waste at Weldon Spring.

In Commodore Applied's other major market -- the neutralization of chemical weapons -- the company announced in February 1997 that its technology had successfully neutralized all components of assembled chemical weapons. In October, the Teledyne-Commodore, LLC, a 50-50 joint venture with Allegheny Teledyne, headed a team that was named a finalist in Alt Tech II, a $40 million program designed to find alternative technologies to incineration for the destruction of chemical weapons.
A decision on which technologies will be funded is expected to be made April 28, 1998.

biz.yahoo.com



To: Andrew Furst who wrote (519)4/8/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: Charger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1755
 
Andrew..what is that amazing spread all about?

bid 3.62 (last 3.875) ask 4.125 (hi 4.06)???? What on earth? If this were a NSDQ stock I would jump to the conclusion that the float was tight and MM's were trying to induce selling as they were short of inventory. What's your interpretation?

Charger