SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazlo Pierce who wrote (18388)4/7/1998 9:14:00 PM
From: Teddy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
**OT** i don't subscribe to AOL, so could you please tell BigJet2 that Teddy said that he writes poorly and the tone of his letter is childish.

Thank you.



To: Lazlo Pierce who wrote (18388)4/7/1998 9:31:00 PM
From: William L. Oppenheim  Respond to of 95453
 
How silly--if there in fact were less drillers today than a year ago, todays drillers would be *better* off for lack of competition. Just shows why short term trading is so ridiculous when folks read and act on snippets of information, accurate or not. Large expenditure programs have a momentum of their own that simply can't be changed overnight. Why some investors feel that such programs will instantaneously change to reflect the market is why prices can get ahead of or behind reality. The underlying momentum is there; the long term oil needs are there; it is fickle investors who quickly change their minds and flit in and out of issues for no sound reason that move markets short term. If such folks acted on a single press release, without considering the entire milieu, that is their problem, and a profit opportunity for the long termers.



To: Lazlo Pierce who wrote (18388)4/8/1998 12:13:00 AM
From: waverider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Smart Money made a very diplomatic statement about why Cramer was no longer with the magazine a couple years ago. All I remember was that there seemed to be way to many editorial comments from him concerning stocks he owned or wanted to own. Take it from there. In my opinion the guy could be an easy target for the SEC.