Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (11576)	4/8/1998 7:44:00 AM
From: Max Haber	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Kim, on the holes being tested, what is the distance between each of the five holes? It is my understanding that the holes dug by B/D were about 1/4 to 1 mile apart. The distance from the last holes on any new assays would be very helpful. Thanks Max

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (11576)	4/8/1998 9:55:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick	Respond to of 20681

Kim, thank you for your response. It would seem there are two parallel efforts being made here. One is a very practical industry accepted concentrated drill program to establish a real estimate of PM's in a specific area. The second is a broad stroke across the playa to show the existence of PM's around the playa. Now, as my comments to Mr. Tai reflect and your comments also imply, if the 100 foot depth program DOES show similar results at similar depths, this will build the case for a sedimentary deposit in which case the broader 28 hole program can be used as an initial indication anyway, of what is in the ground all over the playa. Very exciting stuff. With drilling to begin in about 12 days, and 3 or 4 labs up to speed by then, results should just keep pouring out for an ongoing stream of opt results. (I assume of course) Thanks again. Tom F.