Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tahoeman who wrote (5476)	4/8/1998 1:15:00 AM
From: aleta	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

tahoeman, I decided to use some of my precious sleep time to do a little extra research. I'm very interested in the internet ad industry, so I thought I should look around and see what there is out there besides DCLK and NETZ. Let's see there is CKSG, which is profitable and closed at $21 per share. USWB which IPO'd in Nov. 97 at around $10 and is presently at 26 1/4. Then we have THNK, which about 4 weeks ago was around $10 and closed today at 29 3/16. Next is KTWO which increased revenue over 100% last year and is building a diverse customer base, closed at 4 7/8 today. The last one I looked at was LEAP which closed at 1 7/16. LEAP actually impressed me most with their website. One of their divisions looked like they had some similar technology to the Sesame Ad feature that Echomedia is supposed to have. They have had problems I believe due to heavy ties with the Asian market. Most of these companies are holding groups and some have been heavily acquiring other divisions for their group over the last year or two. All are reporting companies and listed on the NASDAQ. Don't you think that if the Hayton factor wasn't a problem for many people that NETZ would be doing at least as well as LEAP? Aleta

To: tahoeman who wrote (5476)	4/8/1998 1:57:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Yup, there certainly IS value to the discussion of who signs the checks. Just like with the discussion about the audited financials, I see the NETZ supporters are now waffling and preparing for the fallback position if they turn out to be wrong. So, now, it's no big deal who signs the checks. But it does matter - if Hayton signs the checks, then his involvement with the company is much, much deeper than has been disclosed, and this would not be good. I say, yes, let's focus on the present. Now, in the present - who signs the checks? :)