To: RGinPG who wrote (18417 ) 4/8/1998 8:18:00 AM From: JZGalt Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
That's the way it's supposed to be right? Ron, we've talked about earnings revisions before. What you are seeing in these revisions are several things at once. If you are playing this game with long positions only, then I would use the information this way. First, the land drillers got their estimates whacked when the price of crude fell and there was a considerable concern about the discretionary cash flow available to the smaller E&P companies. Consequently land drillers that are having their earnings estimates raised should go on the "watch" list for establishment of long positions. In the longer view, if/when the price of crude starts to recover, you should be looking for the strongest companies in that sector for the easiest money later on. When the tide turns the money flows into the strongest names first IMO. Second, you are seeing company guidance in a limited number of cases (HMAR and MIND) are examples. Or subject to a news event. In this case, you have to determine if the problem is a temporary situation or a permanent screwup on the company's part or is it just a case where the company is being painted with the problems of another company in the same area. For example is HMAR's screwup (temporary) applicable to TMAR? Third, you are seeing some normal adjustments in the numbers as models are readjusted given new information. This would account for the -2% to +2% changes. Not much information in these small changes unless you have better information that would lead you to believe the company is about to pull an "earnings surprise". FGII might be an example there. Last. If you really want to provide some really good information, try also posting the high, low, std.dev. and median estimate with the number of analysts responding. The average is too easily influenced by one analysts with a far out number. A shift of 5% is a much bigger deal if the previous set of estimates was tight with a large number of analysts vs. 2 analysts with a wide range on their "guesstimates". BTW, this is useful information even as presented depending if you are going long or short depending on how you interpret the information. My "spin" is obviously only one way to look at what you have presented. Thanks. BTW, I am done buying in this area until/if the land drillers start to look more promising or they sell off again toward the March 17th level. Easier money in the fast ethernet and ATM chip area, where people are starting to believe we are never going to need components to go into all those boxes being sold to build the internet.