Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Oil & Gas Companies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CharlieChina who wrote (4916)	4/8/1998 4:02:00 PM
From: Richard Saunders	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24921

Nicholas/ we've got the symbol, what are the "duck details"? eom.

To: CharlieChina who wrote (4916)	4/8/1998 5:01:00 PM
From: AL R	Respond to of 24921

Nicholas / Spam It's called Spam and frowned on by some. Al

To: CharlieChina who wrote (4916)	4/10/1998 12:26:00 PM
From: Kerm Yerman	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 24921

Nicholas / United Tri-Star I think what reponses you have had to your comment amounts to lack of information substance. Those ducks you have mentioned will be returning north. We would want to know if they are going to find the same situation when they have returned. In other words, is this just a continuation of the failed Solv-Ex saga? If not, why isn't it. We have an unproven and yet to be successful technology coupled with a near and longer term negative stance on heavy oil. Doesn't sound to encouaging an investment climate to me. I, for one, would like to know why you think this situation is a good investment. Please do not refer me to press releases. I am aware of them, as well as the previous numerous releases from Solv-Ex. I know Koch adds to the creditability, but would like to know how they will, or plan, to overcome the failed attempts of Solv-ex. Did Koch buy into the technology itself - or were there other major considerations behind the cheap purchase of assets. As Richard mentioned, we need to know more about those ducks. You may be right, but would like to have your comments as to specifics why you see investment in favorable terms.