Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Luke who wrote (42846)	4/8/1998 3:20:00 PM
From: thebeach	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 61433

It's 3:20 and we are on the leg up I referred to about an hour ago.

To: Tim Luke who wrote (42846)	4/8/1998 3:38:00 PM
From: blankmind	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 61433

i will have to defend greg on this, you were screaming to sell in the low 20's and even mentioned you sold at the level. you did not mention buying in again until around 35 or 36 and claimed it was time finally. i do not know about the 50's, i was not following the stock at the time.

To: Tim Luke who wrote (42846)	4/8/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: username	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 61433

Tim! I saved your posts! Don't make me post them! :o) The truth is Tim was a little late on his call on the turnaround, he was saying sell in the low 20s, but he did change his mind and got bullish (a little late) and he has been pretty spot on since the low 30s. So don't beat him up too bad...

To: Tim Luke who wrote (42846)	4/8/1998 4:02:00 PM
From: Greg h2o	Respond to of 61433

RE:<<Let me correct you I was the one who said run like hell when the stock was at 50 but nobody believed me. Then stock took the big dive, I then became bullish in the low 20's and bought back in myself.>> Boy, I sure hope to be the first to say BS! You may have covered yourself with one post which you can go back and pull out, but you know darn well you were harping to get out in the low 20's. <<When I say under valued I'm speaking as a trader not as a fundamentalist. Stocks do rise sharply with high p/e's and big debts so go figure.>> I'm sorry, but "undervalued" and "trader" should not be uttered in the same sentence...for a true "trader" could care less about the current "value" of a stock.... sorry, just had to call your above statements, because someone may actually believe you. greg