Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Moot who wrote (7997)	4/8/1998 8:53:00 PM
From: Islander	Respond to of 10836

Moot! Wait! Before you go marching off somewhere to crush your cyanide molar that you are required to wear, let us say that I invite you to post the counter argument to the Corredor opinion, if you can as you say you could. >Yes, I could. ..< Also, you write: > if you and your cohorts are so secure in your knowledge of the outcome of this matter and are determined not to consider anything that might be construed as questioning the inevitability of that outcome<.. Firstly, I do not have any cohorts as in 'banded together', although I may share an association of sorts based on a common perception (ah, semantics) with others on this forum and elsewhere; and secondly, I do not consider the outcome as a fait- accompli, merely most probable. As stated, I would WELCOME a cogently and cohesively structured, factually supported, Kry's-motions-will-not-be-ruled-upon-favorably thesis as contradiction to Corredor's! The point is that no one has ever provided one! I have read your response to Al Miller and they bring up only one or two questions, eg the POA issue, which has been debated ad nauseam (for my feeble, non-pedantic mind) and laid to rest, both in forum debate, and for me, by the SC who could find "no reason" for the Torres/Mael transfer to be considered invalid. But if there is such argument that would cause the SC to overturn the SC's own prior rulings in favor of Mael, by Jove, let's have 'em! No one is trying to put blinders on here; and I personally would rather hear any such arguments now, rather than later... Are you pedantic? So what? Are you idiosyncratic? Who cares?!..On the other hand, if you are marching around with a cyanide molar...maybe I and others in the 'cohort' do care. Cyanide gives you the frothies. Most undignified. Asp venom was the popular poison amongst us Romans. ;) Regards.

To: Moot who wrote (7997)	4/9/1998 1:10:00 AM
From: Carl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

If you and your cohorts are so secure in your knowledge of the outcome of this matter and are determined not to consider anything that might be construed as questioning the inevitability of that outcome, I wonder why you bother to post here or even read this thread. If Crystallex wins, as you seem so adamantly confident they will, the future share price will undoubtedly reflect it. Moot, I've asked the same question here many times and have never had an answer. I doubt you will get one either.