Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Jagow who wrote (11640)	4/9/1998 6:32:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Respond to of 20681

Yes Bob. I believe that would be a material fact if they were more than trace amounts. Henry

To: Bob Jagow who wrote (11640)	4/9/1998 7:58:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Bob, I'm not sure that I understood your question, but I think you were asking why they arent also talking about PGM's. If so, part of the reason is that you have to do seperate tests. It is my understanding(albeit very limited) that to get the best PGM results, you cant do lead fire assay but copper fire assay would be better. Also, even including the higher cost ICP, platinum testing is still much more expensive and much more time consumimg. IMO, they are trying to get the gold information out as fast as they can, and feel that they can come back to the PGM's later. If that was not your question, in the words of Gilda Radner's character Roseanne Roseannnadanna, "never mind". :-) Mark