Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Solder who wrote (52164)	4/9/1998 9:23:00 AM
From: Herb Fuller	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

John , Re:>>>I'm petitioning SI to create a "Kill file" option. <<< That would be a very good thing for SI to do . I would trade the " kill File " for the clubhouse . I don't mind reading the fears of the short sellers as long as they stick to facts . When they can turn one bad quarter into a total death call they are going too far . Long and holding , Herb

To: John Solder who wrote (52164)	4/9/1998 10:01:00 AM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

I wonder if you know about the discussion on this topic on the "Filtering" thread, since I don't remember seeing any posts from you there. #subject-19253 There are many sides to the issue of filtering. Many of them are found there.

To: John Solder who wrote (52164)	4/9/1998 10:24:00 AM
From: Jock Hutchinson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

John: You already have a "Kill File" The name of the poster as well as the initial part of the post are displayed. What more do you need? If Rocky's name shows, just ignore the post. What would a "Kill File" do that you can't already do?

To: John Solder who wrote (52164)	4/9/1998 11:15:00 AM
From: Naggrachi	Respond to of 58324

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <<Without naming names, there are certain pathetic losers with such a void of purpose in their lives that they can find nothing better to do than post the same repetitive nonsensical drivel day after day and month after month.>>

To: John Solder who wrote (52164)	4/9/1998 12:46:00 PM
From: Jock Hutchinson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

You also have the option of exchanging Private messages. With regards to the insults on my behalf, I do not believe that I have insulted anyone unless insulted first. Nevertheless, I have refrained from further insults. But I think an honest review of this boards's contents reveals far far more insults being directed at the bears by the bulls than by the bears at the bulls. Moreover, this is not an Iomega long only board. It's supposed to be a discussion of the relative strengths and weaknesses of IOM. Over the past two years, the street has judged the bears' arguments to be far superior to the bulls' argument. I learned a long time ago that the market doesen't give a hoot about your pain or your joy. She merely prices equities according to its current value. Thus I leave you with this question. What is flawed with Rocky's PE estimate of 15? It seems to be a bit generous in my opinion.