Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (8022)	4/9/1998 12:04:00 PM
From: rob	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

Hi E. Charters: You said "Gomez comes down with her decision on the 13th giving the whole shebang to Crystallex." I haven't been following this thread over the past couple of weeks, I was wondering if this is speculation on your part, or have they announced an official date for the decision? Thanks regards, rob

To: E. Charters who wrote (8022)	4/9/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: Moot	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

Charters/Islander Eric: You disappoint me. I was on the verge of responding to your previous post since it indicated some attempt--a feeble one--to engage in a discussion. I even took the time to review some of Asensio's claims last night inasmuch as you didn't bother to cite specific references. (There seemed to be some difficulty with his site. If he had his own internet rag, we'd likely be treated to cries of "Sabotage!" and a few ghostly death threats, too.) I'm glad I caught your latest post before carrying on with the effort. I was happy to see you acknowledge that there is a great deal to be researched here. I'm curious as to when you plan on starting, given the fact that you've been touting this stock for several months. Here's a little quip in language you might understand: "If you wanna p*ss like the big dogs, you gotta learn to lift yer leg." For the moment, you better stick with squatting. On the 13th of what month do you expect the decision? It certainly won't be this month. That decision, whatever it is and whatever the date, won't impact my portfolio in the least, so your generous offer of a care package is declined. On a humorous note, I notice that several of your responses to my posts have been copied to the Stockhouse thread--as have several responses from others to previous posts of mine. In part, the humour lies in the fact that my original posts have never shown up there--it's an entirely one-sided conversation. (A. Miller did post a link to an early post of mine.) It is also humorous insofar as most of the Stockhouse threaders follow this thread, too. They have the pleasure of reading your bombast in two locations. Some are even clamoring for your appearance there. You really should acknowledge the masses, Eric. It would be like the Pontiff doing an unexpected walk-about among a frenzied group of True Believers. I have no doubt many would swoon at the possibility of a cyber-glance from the Great One. For the most part, they really are a sadly pathetic bunch. It takes away from the humour somewhat. By the way Eric, I notice you are very cavalier with bandying about the word 'liar'. I wonder at the extreme umbrage you took when it was directed at you. I wouldn't do it, of course. I put your blunders down to shoddy research and simple ignorance exacerbated by delusions of grandeur. Islander: I refer you to your 'Bravo' post. Your recent protestations of open-mindedness aren't supported by your posts. You snuggle quite nicely beside Graystone in my NWBW file (Not Worth Bothering With). There you can jerk yourselves, each other, and anyone who cares to join your hear-no-evil/see-no-evil/speak-no-evil circle with no fear of interruption from me. Regards.

To: E. Charters who wrote (8022)	4/9/1998 1:07:00 PM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

The old moot or Giving way It should be apparent that old Moot is a big Asensio fan. Attacking Charters is an old game Moot, didn't you know that. I don't bother with Moot, I read his posts but only for the purpose of strengthening the moot ring. It is strange to watch a guy like Moot disintegrate you know. It is clear Asensio is lying, plain and simple. Not even old Moot is talking about this, publicity sucks, eh Moot. If you can read you can go see for yourself that Asensio is deliberately lying. Moot compliments Asensio's research but seems unaware of the fact that Asensio ignores Inversora Mael's ownership of Las Christinas. You know what would be a real hoot. Having old Moot explain why Asensio's research could have missed that indirect/direct ownership thing, maybe Asensio doesn't want facts to muddy the short attack. <Another root of the old moot ripped out of the ground, weakening the grasp the earth had on the stump. Soon it would be gone, fit for firewood only>