Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (14497)	4/9/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: elko	Respond to of 31646

got to say this, maybe my last post, but.... patrick booth: the aura of shrill desperation in your comments is growing each time you make a post; most intelligent people can construct seemingly logical arguments in the vacuum of information from which it appears to me that you operate- small to medium companies only attracted to TAVA? aaaahahahahahahaha! reality bites, doesn't it? la

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (14497)	4/9/1998 12:15:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 31646

CK, Have to head out for the afternoon, but I thought I might mention that Mr. Bollinger's "bands" are getting mighty tight again on the 30 and 60 minute chart for TAVA. iqc.com This suggests what we'll be moving either one way or another by the day's end. I'm seeing the ask size grow in size at 12 but we're basically even at 11 15/16 5x5 on the bid/ask size. Not as severe as we saw the other day, but indicative of someone trying to keep the lid on at $12. It will interesting to see when I get home whether we were seeing more institutional accumulation below $12 with a chance at an upshot later in the day. Are you ready to cover yet, Patrick?? <wink> RSI, momentum, and stochastics looking basically evenly balanced, but money flow is improving. Regards, Ron

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (14497)	4/9/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: C.K. Houston	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

<A separate point is that the implication, and presumably the plan, is that Y2K revenues will be "significant" in the March quarter. Perhaps we should decide before the event what this means, as it will be a good indicator of the likely success of TAVA.> Patrick "Short" Booth ______________________________________________________________________ Patrick, I don't want to be included in the "we" of yours. I've already made my decision on the likely success of TAVA, as have the rest of us "longs". I don't have a problem with shorts and day-traders. I have several good friends who do this. I do have a problem with shorts who are parasitic posters preying on naive newbies. Cheryl

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (14497)	4/9/1998 1:26:00 PM
From: Mr Logic	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 31646

Cheryl, thanks for your comprehensive response. As always you describe what I said as nonsense and then proceed to avoid the question before issuing another nicely presented CK press release covering a whole range of nice sounding points irrelevant to the issue at hand. OK, OK, I give in, Cheryl *You win the presentation war!!!. Now, how about some content? - how many of these companies are using the CD, and using it without TAVA assistance? There is a limit to how thinly TAVA can spread itself. The big bucks for TAVA are in high volume, zero effort sales of the CD, not pilots and contracts taking up their scarce resource. Fine, of course they can use the packaged CD methodology in their work with these clients. But hey need to sell many thousands of them to make significant Y2K money. You can easily work out the numbers for yourself. >>Have you looked at the CD demo? (Not too many available in the UK.) I have. And so have a few of the engineers on this thread.<< ...and what? You admit you don't know anything about the plant floor environment. Let's hear someone knowledgeable try to tell us that the CD is anything else than what I described it as. Why don't you challenge what I say, I didn't spend time looking at the demos because I enjoy it. >>ROFL - If it's SO easy, why doesn't TAVA have any competitors in this arena? Seems like a lot of companies would like to get on the bandwagon.<< TAVA does have competitors in this area, that's the point.* Hey, I'm getting better at this highlighting stuff. This is bread and butter to Project Managers, particularly if they work for a consulting house bodyshop and specialise in plant floor stuff. It is not proprietary. I think half the people here must think it somehow fixes year 2000 problems. It doesn't. OK, maybe it diagnoses and tests equipment? wrong again. It doesn't do that either. What do you think it does Cheryl? P. ps: you also win the irritating "I'm so much smarter than you" laugh with the liberal sprinkling of "LOL" and "ROFL"s.