Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chris Chandler who wrote (43117)	4/9/1998 12:15:00 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

I don't think Tim is being asked to apologize for being wrong. He's being asked for apologize for BLATENTLY LYING about his recommendations over the past year. Tom

To: Chris Chandler who wrote (43117)	4/9/1998 12:18:00 PM
From: Satyr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

Chris the question isn't if Tim is right 90% 80% 705 or whatever it's that he lied about what he said. Well Blankman has proven his point but what he's doing now serves no purpose. Let him and Tim take care of it themselves but let him wait til Tim comes back.

To: Chris Chandler who wrote (43117)	4/9/1998 12:55:00 PM
From: blankmind	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

you are clearly correct and i am wrong. tim should be able to call people names and make patently false claims, we still have the first amendment. where did this begin? this little diddy to greg h2o Let me correct you I was the one who said run like hell when the stock was at 50 but nobody believed me. Then stock took the big dive, I then became bullish in the low 20's and bought back in myself. - tim luke this is tim hyping tim. sorry, you need to rethink you statement about tim not hyping tim. sorry but this is just not true, he purchased at 37 and 27, sold at 23 1/2, and told everyone else to sell. this is called hype, and tim raised the issue, not me or anyone else. next: back I will be forced to blankFULLofcrapMIND in his place. where were you? tim can predict all he wants, that is not the issue, and you do not see anything about me criticizing his predictions. coming back after predicting wrong in the 20's and early 30's and then saying how you were a buyer is deceptive and wrong, and dare i say hyping. i hope this clarifies the issue, it is not hyping, but hyping after clearly stating the opposite in the past, and now claiming otherwise.