Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.R. who wrote (3284)	4/9/1998 7:15:00 PM
From: K A Anderson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6654

J.R. I am sort of torn on the issues you and others are bringing up, Jack Arnold is being honest and up front with his intentions, so it shouldnt cause a great panic, and Novice Bob summed it up very well. I hope that CVIA/WOTD will also be as patient with the investors, as the investors have been with them through the merger talks. I think Mr Arnold respects his shareholders and listens, but ultimately has to decide what he feels is best for the company as a whole. I hope CVIA/WOTD will hold off on the reverse split until, at least .1 preferably at .25 so the stock and company can gain a little strength and "buff up" a little. At .02 to .06 a reverse split is going to be tough on everyone, the investors, the management, and think about the merger candidates reaction. NOW FOR THE RECORD CVIA HAS 110 million tradable shares, but can issue upto 150 million... those left over 40 million shares are NOT ISSUED yet and can not be considered a factor at this moment... in the future maybe... but not at this moment. They could issue these 40 million shares for the first acquasition, before the first merger with out a reverse split.... so let not start jumping to conclusions yet, Jack hasnt hurt us yet, and I personally see no reason why he would now. Look at it this way CVIA has $500k in cash and $800,000 in UN-ISSUED stock... we are not in dire straights yet, and I cant see a big need to rush a reverse split. At least at the moment. KAA

To: J.R. who wrote (3284)	4/10/1998 11:45:00 AM
From: Leroy Chandler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

J.R There is evidence (prove) that most reverse split don't work out the best for the company neither the shareholders, a wise GEO, don't use the reverse split method to bring up his company. Aqua Vie Beverage Co (AVBC) REFUSE DO TO A REVERSE SPLIT AND IT WENT UP FROM .O4 TO .60 IN JUST TWO WEEKS, withing 12 months it will go up $4.00 to $6.00 IMO. IMO the reverse split will not work for this company, until it shows promises that it can go up with out a reverse split. There is an old saying "greedy puppy always get shoke". JMO. Those that have knowledge about the history of reverse split will agree with me. Leroy