SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Peruvian Gold Ltd. PVO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (534)4/10/1998 12:42:00 AM
From: Robert Dydo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 892
 
I did check the circular. Goepel Shields was advising PVO in their search for properties. Goepel Shields and Yorkton were also an agent for GBU offerings. As soon as PVO expressed interest to acquire GBU's properties Goepel has ceased their advisory services for PVO. That is what I have read.
In PVO's nr I can read what I suspected Bradstone to do. It is obvious to me that Atkinson would make PVO's money go somewhere else, against the area of business PVO is into. Why someone wants to believe that Bradstone would be a good guy here? Just because they could not drill spectacular intervals in 1997 and whole junior market sucked, Bradstone showed up and only on rumor we were expecting some sort of takeover of PVO?Why did they showed up? Not for PVO's properties but only for the money. PVO is telling us they found exciting projects with 2.4M oz of gold at the moment, they have the money to develop it. If this was the investment play for Bradstone, they should be happy. At last PVO can make a difference.
Why everyone questions PVO decision? This a takeover, acquisition, they would not do it without approval if that was illegal.
Atkinson is a broker, Henstridge is a geologist. Trust who you want, but I bought exploration company which can become a producer one day, not a place on the wagon of supporters for some unhappy cashsucker.
Robert