SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pancho Villa who wrote (6700)4/10/1998 10:38:00 AM
From: clochard  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 18691
 
Anyone with 20/20 hindsight can now wish they were long YHOO, AOL, AMZN, and others. One can only say that Craig was right, but he was lucky, not fundamentally right. This thread is about fundamentals, not gambling. Why do we need to read about his "methodology" if we are marching to the beat of a different drum?



To: Pancho Villa who wrote (6700)4/10/1998 1:12:00 PM
From: Peter V  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18691
 
Re: Craig. Good post Pancho. Craig has the right to be here and express his opinions. He could be more polite, but he has not done anything IMHO that warrants his removal from SI, as some have suggested. (I think too many people ask to have thread hecklers removed from SI, and I do not think requests to the webmistress should be so frequent. It should be the extreme and rare case to ask for someone's removal, usually for disseminating demonstrably false information and representing it as a verifiable fact (as opposed to opinions or rumors) or using extreme profanity, neither of which I have seen here. Simple rudeness is not cause for removal, although it is NOT welcome). Conversely, those replying to Craig also have the right to do so, and I hope both sides try to maintain civility. Just because someone started the rude posts, does not mean the responders have to continue them. Supposedly, we are adults here.