Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ross Mickey who wrote (9479)	4/10/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: Quickdraw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14627

Ross: While I am sure we agree on many things regarding PFG, this is where you and I differ in our assessments. In my mind, there is an "appearance" of a good working relationship between the two parties, but rest assured Barrick continues to let Pacrim know its place. If this latest statement by Tom Shrake regarding the "loading of the columns" relates to the Sep 22, 1997 samples, then Barrick has now pushed the requirement for the release of data into the next quarter, which began on April 1. To begin this process, they must have received the assay results Bill has spoken about but if as I suspect, Barrick's contention is that they were received on or after April 1, Barrick is under no obligation to report the results until the end of the the second quarter (end of June 1998). I suspect this is the case, but I'll be happy to be proven wrong. Regards, Rick