SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Thermo Tech Technologies (TTRIF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Casey who wrote (3949)4/10/1998 3:45:00 PM
From: Clement  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6467
 
Casey,

Is it therefore a matter of investment principle that you invest based solely on potential and exercise blind disbelief on any potential negatives -- for that is what you have implied. To say that the issues do not mean much is fine and very much up to an investor's interpretation. To ignore them altogether is not only stupid but a sure way to lose money. I simply hope that you are of the former camp and have examined if you feel that they are unimportant the reasons why they are unimportant. If you have, fine, then that last bit doesn't apply, but to deny that they are in the very least valid concerns is an act of grave stupidity.

> That was what I was saying with #3923. They are differenct systems
> and are outside of the 1993 agreement, (IMO for Zeev, Clement, Dave
> et al. <g>).

Then you still haven't answered me/us why the materials in the IR package state regardless that TTRIF licensed the TMP's (and those were the words used by them) to Trooper Technologies. So are you going to tell me that TTRIF IR made a mistake and refuses to correct them in their present IR package even though it could be construed as being misleading -- not once but no less than 3 times -- and I did not even look too hard. If I am dead wrong, prove it -- and even if I am, it would seem that TTRIF IR is as well -- which would make me wonder -- are they right on every other issue as they have been in the past? <g>

Clement