Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SC Anderson who wrote (14591)	4/11/1998 1:59:00 AM
From: Quad Sevens	Respond to of 31646

SC Anderson: I agree that CR has made outlandish comments about TAVA on other threads (I gave him hell for it on Roger's Short thread). I'm willing to give him some latitude, for he knew not what he wrote. Cheryl and a lot of the gang want to run CR and Patrick off the thread, to protect poor TAVA newbies who need mothering. I'd like to hear the arguments of serious shorts. If they "drop a few incomplete half-truths", let's call them on it. If they become as stupid and annoying as MW, then we can tell them to stick it. That, as you point out, hasn't happened yet. You wrote "But if the self-indulgent musings of shorts is informative and valuable to your position - well, so be it." I don't know if it will be valuable or not until I hear it. Self-indulgence? Seen what some of the longs write? SC: Someday you will sell your TAVA. (Even Cheryl might, perhaps in 2004 :) .) At that point in time, I'd like to hear the reasons for your decision, before you're run out of town as a naysaying shortselling scumbag. Wade PS: << Wade, my eyes are just fine, thank-you. 3rd grade? Come on Wade, please. Play nice. Re-read the post. The comparison to MW was not a comparison of intellect or motive. >> Very true. I should have picked one of the many much worse posts as a point of departure.