Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Stock Swap -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (13241)	4/10/1998 5:40:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17305

No my remarks are an exaggeration. I never back up my remarks about other peoples opinions because they are just opinions...they rarely have back-up for their positions in the first place. So yes, my remark about 1929 is an exaggeration. But I would think that's obvious. We're talking about a big kahuna here. I suppose 1929 was a Big Kahuna and we are speaking of a big kahuna. I have no problem with any of this "kahuna-speak", my posture is to play for a change and win or lose I get out quickly. Anyone who holds out for a "Big Kahuna" will, more often than not, get fried. I have not gone back to re-check earlier posts on this....to be honest, the entire concept of following Dave's scenario has me leaning a bit to the bullish side, at least into expiry....but no. I don't wish to put forth the concept that kerPlunk is calling for 1929. Frankly, I don't know what the hell he's calling for. Has he said? No, he has not. It's a Biblical kind of thing. Hey, for all we know, the guy's an atheist.