Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (11673)	4/11/1998 12:03:00 PM
From: JIN CHUN	Respond to of 27968

OFF TOPIC I've told the truth. I'm not going to answer every bizarre question of yours So, I guess you are saying that you were truthful in that you bought in at .33, honestly thought that trading in FAMH would be halted, were truthful in that you sold at the morning bell per post #1450, which would mean that you had a realized loss of either $19 off of the 1900 block that was sold, or $37 off of the 3700 block that was sold that morning. Were you also truthful when you said that Atrix management had forced the hand with Firamada by making them correct their press release? Were you also truthful when you called Wayne J. insane, or insulted many of the other posters on this thread? BIZZARE? The question goes to the heart of why so many people, at least a dozen, have accused you of either working for, associating with, or being friends with someone who makes a market, or brokers in this stock. The question is not only relevant to your motivation, it is asking what that motivation is. This is a public forum, and it is easy enough for anyone to hide behind their keyboards and make outlandish statements without being responsible for those statements. Those that have been long on this stock, myself included, have nothing to hide. Our motivation is clear, so yes it would be easy enough to accuse me or anyone else as being a cheerleader, or obviously biased because I have an equity stake in this company. Anything that I say or post here ,aside from factual information which can be independently verified, would obviously have to be filtered with that bias. If someone points out a discrepancy, or a negative comment, etc., will they be called an MM on this thread? I don't think so. But if someone, like yourself, were to consistently defame the management,"Liar Monas", make false statements, "Atrix management forced FAMH to retract", etc., over 300 times and counting, I would think that the question would be valid. Those that have an equity position in this stock have something to gain, and something to lose. You, in making such ridiculous statements have something to gain, and nothing to lose. It doesn't make sense that you are only here to "protect" our investment. I, for one, do not need the handholding. If I were as irrational or mean spirited as you seem to be, I would plonk myself over to the SRS thread and throw out tidbits like how Phillips will introduce the first USB fully digital speakers that have a proprietary algorithm for QUAD sound spatialization, and that Windows 98 will allow digital speakers to bypass the sound card and use spatialization directly off of the MMX instruction subset on Pentiums, K6's, and other cpu's (PC Magazine vol. 17 no. 8). But I wouldn't, because I neither intend to or am interested in investing in that company or any of it's competitors. Jin. still waiting for a rational answer.