Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nick thomas who wrote (4779)	4/11/1998 10:22:00 AM
From: The Barracuda™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

Everest sounds great. I own it.

To: nick thomas who wrote (4779)	4/11/1998 4:17:00 PM
From: BLZBub	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7966

Nick, At the MEG on Thursday afternoon, Jack MacCleary of Troymin commented that the deal with Monopros was only for property blocks that were 100% owned by Troymin. The reasoning was that jointly held or optioned properties would complicate any deal making with the major. Can you get back to us, and let us know which juniors own 100% of the rights of properities in the vicinity of the Ashton kimberlites? Bill.

To: nick thomas who wrote (4779)	4/11/1998 7:50:00 PM
From: JP	Respond to of 7966

<<How does EVEREST MINES sound?>> What the DeBeers deal tells me is it reiterates the point that the closer you are to the proven Kims the better your chances. My favorites are 1)PUG -you can't lose on this one IMO 2)ALR -the closest cheapy but relatively small land position. But this close to the Kims -and sandwiched between the two Troymin blocks which are going to look like swiss cheese a year from now. 3)EVR/MEO -Pat Powers runs both of these and between the two they have almost all bases covered. It is obvious that when Powers was staking he split the land area between the two companies. JP