SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TREND1 who wrote (31985)4/11/1998 6:31:00 PM
From: DavidG  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 53903
 
Larry,

Does Micron have a PC/100 sdram ready for BX440 board ?

I am not sure, although I tend to believe yes, for at least the 16mb SDRAM chips. Got the following off their website, which I recall being there for a few months unchanged:

Speed Grades
Micron provides 83 MHz, 100 MHz and 125 MHz speed grades, marked as -12, -10 and -8x respectively, with the high-volume output in the 100 MHz, or -10 speed grade. Both -10 and -12 conform to the de facto industry-standard PC requirement for a tAC = 9ns at 66 MHz, CAS latency = 2.
Micron's -10 and -8x meet the PC66 and PC100 specifications, including support for concurrent AUTO PRECHARGE.

Please refer to the latest 16 Meg SDRAM data sheet for a -8x speed specification matrix.


It sounds a little confusing which the "forever bears" can have a field day with, but I believe that what they said was the -10 and -8x meet BOTH the PC66 and PC100 specs. Maybe a phone call to Kip might clear it up.<g>

DavidG

PS: I thought we read in one of the news articles that MU indicated they had the 64mb SDRAM chips complying with PC100 and ready to ship when needed.



To: TREND1 who wrote (31985)4/11/1998 8:02:00 PM
From: DJBEINO  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Intel drags the PC industry to 100-MHz terrain

techweb.com



To: TREND1 who wrote (31985)4/11/1998 9:48:00 PM
From: DavidG  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 53903
 
Larry,

Wasn't it Earlie who said Fidelity had sold out of MU by January. I think he was mistaken. It looks like they increased their stake when you add up all those funds.

It looks like a total of almost 25%. Do you think they know something we don't know? Probably, I think everybody knows more than us.<g>

DavidG