Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: donald sew who wrote (39109)	4/11/1998 4:48:00 PM
From: jjs_ynot	Respond to of 58727

One person's view of Elliot Wave Analysis Message 4033088 PS to post a link - just go up to URL box, highlight location and do an edit copy. Then you can edit paste into the body of a message. Happy Holidays, dave

To: donald sew who wrote (39109)	4/11/1998 6:20:00 PM
From: The Perfect Hedge	Respond to of 58727

>>> THIS IS NOT CONCLUSIVE, AND ONLY STARTED THIS TYPE OF ANALYSIS RECENTLY SO DO NOT GO NUTS GLEN<<<< YAAAAAAHHHHOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! Me go nuts?? GD

To: donald sew who wrote (39109)	4/11/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: Nancy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

<<Spotted something unique. The average number of NEW LOWS since mid-January, when this rally started, is only 47. On 4/7 the NAZ's NEW LOWS spiked up substantially to 114, when the 10 day average was only 57. In fact it was the first time that it spiked up this high since the beginning of this rally.>> Don, I believe you get the CORRUPTED data - quote plus has new low on that day as 97, (shocked me because the market didn't look that bad) but when I check WSJ that night, it has only 34, IBD has 30 reported in next day's newspaper. When things suddenly go out of whack, better check your data from different sources first. btw, 10 dma has never got above 40. I use WSJ for my data - they mostly +/- 5 from IBD numbers, never figure out why. But close enough not to cause major discrepancy.