SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : CYCOMM (CYII)-on aquisition trail -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James W. Bradsh who wrote (1196)4/12/1998 10:17:00 AM
From: Don Parker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1800
 
An open letter to all Cycomm stockholders on this thread:

It has been at least a year since it became obvious to us all that Cycomm International was transitioning from losing money to making money. There is no other reason for us to have invested money in the company. Some are in relatively high and some are in relatively low. Some are holding large positions, more than 75,000 shares, and some smaller. The expectation is the same for us all. I read all of the rationale given by various contributers to the thread as to why the stock is not moving up from the $2 range and I am convinced more and more that it is not because of profitability but because of a lack of exposure of the company. Exposure to some of the investment media, i.e. newspapers, trade magazines, TV, and investment newsletter writers, all of which do not need to see profitability to recognize a company in a turnaround situation and report objectively about their potential and what they do see. The Individual Investor article is a classic example.How does anyone learn of a potential investment opportunity? Someone tells them or they either read it or see it on TV. There is no bad news at Cycomm today that we are aware of..... none. Why isn't there some information out there somewhere for someone to read or see concerning what Cycomm is up to. The list of cities using the PCMobile is impressive, impressive enough that any of us should see that the message is not getting out or it already would have if something wasn't wrong. What is it? Is it the Board of Directors?...is it management?..is it Stern & Co.?
Fellow investors, I'm telling you that unless something is done to reverse this situation when Cycomm turns a profit we will be the only ones who know about it. Obviously, that is not a true statement but for the impact that positive earnings could have versus what they probably will have based on the past, it might as well be true. As stockholders you have the right to know why management is not doing all humanly possible to maximize stochholder value. Are they? If you think they are then please tell me and why you think so.
I have already used the example of a friend of mine who did his own DD after I told him about the company and he went out and bought 45,000 shares. There is NO information about this company out there nor has there been since the II article. I personally suggest that we each write Bud Hawk a letter, not E-mail, and as stockholders state our concern for this lack of exposure.
I promise never to write anything this long again on this thread. My Email address is in my bio and would appreciate hearing your feelings on this either on the thread or E-mail.

Don Parker